New York Times v. Sullivan and the Forgotten Session of the US Supreme Court

<p><em>New York Times v. Sullivan</em>, the US Supreme Court&rsquo;s defining First Amendment opinion of the twentieth century, is under constant attack. Once viewed as occupying the same rarified air as&nbsp;<em>Brown v. Board of Education</em>,&nbsp;<em>Sullivan&nbsp;</em>has become the target of the conservative political and legal establishment that wants it overruled.</p> <p>A recent but largely forgotten special session of the Supreme Court held in May 1998, however, reveals a conservative defense of&nbsp;<em>Sullivan</em>. It reveals that, towards the end of his career, the longtime critic of&nbsp;<em>Sullivan</em>,<em>&nbsp;</em>Chief Justice William Rehnquist, defended&nbsp;<em>Sullivan</em>&nbsp;and its democracy-enriching effects<em>.</em></p> <p><a href="https://medium.com/lessons-from-history/new-york-times-v-sullivan-and-the-forgotten-session-of-the-supreme-court-74b8bde817ec"><strong>Visit Now</strong></a></p>