New York Times v. Sullivan and the Forgotten Session of the US Supreme Court
<p><em>New York Times v. Sullivan</em>, the US Supreme Court’s defining First Amendment opinion of the twentieth century, is under constant attack. Once viewed as occupying the same rarified air as <em>Brown v. Board of Education</em>, <em>Sullivan </em>has become the target of the conservative political and legal establishment that wants it overruled.</p>
<p>A recent but largely forgotten special session of the Supreme Court held in May 1998, however, reveals a conservative defense of <em>Sullivan</em>. It reveals that, towards the end of his career, the longtime critic of <em>Sullivan</em>,<em> </em>Chief Justice William Rehnquist, defended <em>Sullivan</em> and its democracy-enriching effects<em>.</em></p>
<p><a href="https://medium.com/lessons-from-history/new-york-times-v-sullivan-and-the-forgotten-session-of-the-supreme-court-74b8bde817ec"><strong>Visit Now</strong></a></p>