Review of “Ninety-Nine Percent?

<p>In their recent paper &quot;Ninety-Nine Percent? Re-Examining the Consensus on the Anthropogenic Contribution to Climate Change&quot;, David Dentelski and colleagues provide a thoughtful critique of prior research claiming an overwhelming scientific consensus on human-caused climate change.</p> <p>The authors raise important concerns about potential subjectivity and bias in the rating systems used to categorize abstracts from scientific papers. In particular, they demonstrate that many &quot;skeptic&quot; papers would be classified as having no position or even supporting the consensus, based on a &quot;mellow abstract bias&quot;. Their analysis shows the difficulty in making definitive claims about consensus using only quick reviews of abstracts.</p> <p><a href="https://medium.com/@europeanwolfobservatory/review-of-ninety-nine-percent-21e257e61fc0"><strong>Visit Now</strong></a></p>
Tags: Percent Review