Oriental Philosophy Explains What Sigmund Freud’s “Eros and Thanatos” Couldn’t

At end of his long and illustrious career, his book, <a href="https://www.amazon.com/Beyond-Pleasure-Principle-Norton-Library/dp/0393007693/ref=sr_1_1?crid=ZHGGI90P9Q9G&keywords=Beyond+The+Pleasure+Principle&qid=1654517872&sprefix=beyond+the+pleasure+principle%2Caps%2C848&sr=8-1" rel="noopener ugc nofollow" target="_blank">Beyond The Pleasure Principle</a>, propounded a new theory to describe the other side of human behaviour. It was an antithesis to his lifelong work to describe the “pull of life” as the single biggest human drive. Freud’s theories were closer to those of Aristotle than Lao-Tzu’s. He was a man of supreme scientific temperament. As scientists do, he tried to explain the complex workings of the human mind through a single dimension. <a href="https://medium.com/publishous/oriental-philosophy-explains-what-sigmund-freuds-eros-and-thanatos-couldn-t-7a65ea433d7">Learn More</a>