On Neo-Shamanism

<p>In the twentieth century, the work of Eliade and L&eacute;vi-Strauss on shamanism led to the emergence of a first theory considering the therapeutic benefits of shamanic practice, thereby contrasting with antecedent theories in anthropology that defined shamanism as a mental illness or as a farce. According to L&eacute;vi-Strauss, the &ldquo;efficiency of symbols&rdquo; in shamanic practices structures a mythology and a set of actions that are beneficial to one&rsquo;s psyche. In Eliade&rsquo;s work,&nbsp;<em>Shamanism: Archaic Techniques of Ecstasy</em>, the ecstatic journey and trance became the heart of the shamanic experience. His approach defines the shamanic experience as the expression&nbsp;<em>par excellence</em>&nbsp;of these &ldquo;masters of chaos&rdquo;. Inspired by his work, many authors did not hesitate to reinterpret the phenomenon of ecstasy and trance in order to propose a whole set of&nbsp;<em>modi operandi</em>&nbsp;in order to democratize states of ecstasy. And Eliade himself was a nostalgic at heart who wished to restore a relationship with mythical times, wherein the experience of the Sacred was more accessible&sup2;.&nbsp;</p> <p><a href="https://medium.com/theological-and-religious-archetypes/neoshamanism-28afec913ba2"><strong>Learn More</strong></a></p>
Tags: neo Shamanism