Damaging Ripple Effects of Employee Turnover
<p>Bill Gates’s profound assertion, “Take our best 20 people away, and I will tell you that Microsoft would become an unimportant company,” resonates with industry leaders across the globe. The scourge of employee turnover goes beyond the mere loss of personnel — it signifies the attrition of a company’s intellectual prowess, cultural essence, and brand reputation . To dive deeper into the multifaceted implications of turnover, stay with me.</p>
<p><img alt="" src="https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fit:700/1*Uix1TcclVkFgEv52gqtSvA.png" style="height:495px; width:700px" /></p>
<p>As Jamie Dimon, CEO of JP Morgan Chase, insightfully noted, “<strong>Hiring people is an art, not a science.</strong>” However, the cost of losing an artfully selected individual is actual and damaging. It’s not just the recruitment outlays but the lurking costs of onboarding, the development period to peak productivity, potential oversights by newcomers, and the loss of client trust due to inconsistent point of contact.</p>
<p><em>General Electric in the 90s - Their loss of top-tier engineers to competitors was not just a staffing issue. R&D slowdowns, patent entanglements, and comprehensive retraining schemes escalated the financial ramifications exponentially.</em></p>
<p><a href="https://medium.com/@thisisvibhuti/damaging-ripple-effects-of-employee-turnover-21fbad21b3cd"><strong>Click Here</strong></a></p>