Coverage analysis from the command line

<p>Physical coverage plays a pivotal role in detecting mis-assembled regions: even if the sequence coverage track shows no interruptions, its possible that the physical coverage one will, thus hinting at a possible chimeric sequence:</p> <p><img alt="" src="https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fit:630/1*qp5KBPq9pgone3c0llmfwg.png" style="height:107px; width:700px" /></p> <p>An example of a&nbsp;<strong>chimeric contig</strong>&nbsp;identified plotting the&nbsp;<em>physical coverage track of a mate paired library.</em></p> <p>The above example, from my PhD thesis, was obtained in the early days of NGS when mixing technologies (Roche 454 for producing&nbsp;<em>contigs</em>, thanks to the longest reads and SOLiD Mate Paired library for&nbsp;<em>scaffolding</em>) was as common as painful&sup2;.</p> <p><a href="https://medium.com/ngs-sh/coverage-analysis-from-the-command-line-542ef3545e2c"><strong>Read More</strong></a></p>