The Conundrum of Compartmentalized Consensus: The Rabbit Hole of Extreme Ethicacy & Over Political Correctness

In a world where every voice yearns to be heard and every opinion holds weight, the concept of consensus emerges as the harmonizing chord that orchestrates societal symphony. Often envisioned as the democratic heartbeat, consensus represents more than mere agreement — it’s the collective pulse of diverse wills aligning in a unified rhythm. Yet, within the tapestry of unity, there exists a paradox, a phenomenon we’ll call the Compartmentalized Consensus Conundrum. This is where the waters get murky and the smooth sailing of societal accord hits the high seas of discord. The paradox lies in the reality that consensus is not always a genuine meeting of minds but can sometimes be a facade, plastered over with the wallpaper of conformity. It’s in this space where the echo of the group drowns out the whispers of the individual, and democracy’s delicate dance between unity and diversity teeters on a tightrope. <a href="https://medium.com/@GregoryBetti/the-conundrum-of-compartmentalized-consensus-the-rabbit-hole-of-extreme-ethicacy-over-political-65e788490ad2">Click Here</a>