Buddha was NOT an avatar of Vishnu
<p>If Harry Truman were alive today, he would modify his statement <em>“if you cannot convince them, confuse them”</em> with a new premise “<em>if you cannot convince them, fake yourself</em>”. The latter one is very much in sync with today’s epoch, especially when it comes to dealing with the ‘historians’ and ‘experts’ and last-but-not-least the trollers-and-toadies who twist narratives to respectively serve the interests and agenda of their political ideologies and masters.</p>
<p>And, this has been going on for centuries!</p>
<p>Recently, in <a href="https://medium.com/@jaiminism/the-cost-of-defending-buddha-and-dr-ambedkar-951c4a19772f" rel="noopener">my observation</a>, there’s something fishy against Buddha on social media, especially on Twitter. Suddenly. Verily. No doubt the current landscape has benefitted a lot from the production and dissemination of ‘fake’ news, but it went so far that ‘otherization’ has been normalized very conveniently. With all due respect, please take note of a very uncomfortable fact: <strong>Buddha is not an avatar of Vishnu</strong></p>
<p><a href="https://jaiminism.medium.com/buddha-was-not-an-avatar-of-vishnu-ed6e5b91d911"><strong>Website</strong></a></p>