Taking Your Reading to Another Level
<p>Iwas midway writing this piece during a chillout session when I read </p>
<p><a href="https://medium.com/u/97501628f9a2?source=post_page-----fc9c5c230461--------------------------------" rel="noopener" target="_blank">Philip Ogley</a></p>
<p>’s essay<em> </em><a href="https://medium.com/ellemeno/who-reads-a-novel-in-a-single-sitting-e6b14918d9d9" rel="noopener"><em>‘Who Reads a Novel in a Single Sitting?</em></a>’ The questions he asked which included — A<em>re you a plodder or a speed reader? </em>— reminded me of a few incidents where I was teased for being a slow reader. Yes, I am a plodder. But there are salient reasons for that.</p>
<p><strong><em>“We read to know we’re not alone.” ― William Nicholson, ‘Shadowlands: A Play’</em></strong></p>
<p>At university I had a compulsory module called <em>Effective Reading</em>. I know it sounds ridiculous considering we made it to tertiary level education and suddenly, we’re forced to examine how efficient we are at reading and comprehension. I was wrong. It was a good subject. It was a game changer.</p>
<p>I’d forgotten the lecturer who taught me (<em>sorry, sir/madam</em>) but I remember what I had to do in that course for the entire semester. Reading was a fraction of it. <strong><em>Strategizing</em></strong> your thoughts was the bulk of it.</p>
<p>It raised a few useful questions that had long-term benefits. Before that, allow me to ask you: <strong>If you could only keep one book in your library, what book would it be?</strong></p>
<p>The course then taught us how to deep dive into a book, make annotations, how to challenge the author, its historicism, and your very own thoughts. The process can be distilled to three rules:</p>
<p><a href="https://medium.com/brain-labs/taking-your-reading-to-another-level-fc9c5c230461"><strong>Read More</strong></a></p>