Finally Studying Those Research Has Left Behind in Favor of White Subjects
<p>Years ago, while visiting a major pharmaceutical firm engaged in research all over the United States, I questioned <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3935672/" rel="noopener ugc nofollow" target="_blank">who was in the sample</a> and why it seemed certain groups were missing. I also asked about research in China. The answers came back in a casual manner. “<em>Oh, we can’t get them</em>” or “<em>They’re different from us</em>.” The “us” meant white people, and there is some evidence in certain groups for genetic differences that might affect results in studies, but it was disturbing.</p>
<p>More disturbing than the comments was that they were coming from a Black researcher at the company. But color or ethnicity aren’t the only reasons some are missing from research projects. We might also say the same about <em>women being missing</em>—that bridge has been crossed now after a <em>prime market for medications </em>aimed at women was realized, I am assuming.</p>
<p><a href="https://drpatfarrell.medium.com/finally-studying-those-research-has-left-behind-in-favor-of-white-subjects-84ffed4e4e7e"><strong>Website</strong></a></p>