Is it Possible to Prove the Simulation Hypothesis?

<p>In 2003, the philosopher Nick Bostrom postulated that we live in a computer simulation run by our advanced, possibly post-human, descendants [1][2]. Today, many scientists and big thinkers, including Neil DeGrasse Tyson and Elon Musk, believe there&rsquo;s a good chance this&nbsp;<em>simulation hypothesis</em>&nbsp;is true [3]. It certainly explains why mathematics so elegantly describes nature, why observers seem to influence quantum events, and why we appear alone in the universe.</p> <p>Even stranger,&nbsp;<em>you&nbsp;</em>could be the only&nbsp;<em>real thing</em>&nbsp;in this simulation. Perhaps you&rsquo;re a brain in a vat, immersing yourself in a historical simulation. For computational efficiency, this simulation might render only the things with which you&rsquo;re currently interacting. When you go inside and close your door, the world outside may turn off like a refrigerator light, with you none the wiser.</p> <p><a href="https://pub.towardsai.net/is-it-possible-to-prove-the-simulation-hypothesis-2f5eedffd704"><strong>Visit Now</strong></a></p>