RAG vs Finetuning — Which Is the Best Tool to Boost Your LLM Application?

<h1>Prologue</h1> <p>As the wave of interest in Large Language Models (LLMs) surges, many developers and organisations are busy building applications harnessing their power. However, when the pre-trained LLMs out of the box don&rsquo;t perform as expected or hoped, the question on how to improve the performance of the LLM application. And eventually we get to the point of where we ask ourselves: Should we use&nbsp;<a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.11401" rel="noopener ugc nofollow" target="_blank">Retrieval-Augmented Generation</a>&nbsp;(RAG) or model finetuning to improve the results?</p> <p>Before diving deeper, let&rsquo;s demystify these two methods:</p> <p><strong>RAG</strong>: This approach integrates the power of retrieval (or searching) into LLM text generation. It combines a retriever system, which fetches relevant document snippets from a large corpus, and an LLM, which produces answers using the information from those snippets. In essence, RAG helps the model to &ldquo;look up&rdquo; external information to improve its responses.</p> <p><a href="https://towardsdatascience.com/rag-vs-finetuning-which-is-the-best-tool-to-boost-your-llm-application-94654b1eaba7"><strong>Visit Now</strong></a></p>
Tags: RAG Finetuning