The Ongoing Wait for Male Contraception: Who is Responsible?
<p>Responsibility in science and innovation is typically talked about for revolutionary but ethically challenging technologies such as <a href="https://glocalismjournal.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/stilgoe_gjcpi_2017_3.pdf" rel="noopener ugc nofollow" target="_blank">self-driving cars</a>, <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hast.484" rel="noopener ugc nofollow" target="_blank">CRISPR genetic engineering technology</a>, or <a href="https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374505266_Ethical_Tensions_in_Human-AI_Companionship_A_Dialectical_Inquiry_into_Replika" rel="noopener ugc nofollow" target="_blank">human-AI companionship</a>. Whilst these discussions are crucial, it shifts the focus of scientists, government, businesses, and the general public from <strong>easily attainable technological advancements that can be just as transformative in our daily lives, revolutionising gender relations and significantly reducing gender inequalities</strong> — that is more choices of male contraception.</p>
<p><a href="https://medium.com/@michelled.mnbt/the-ongoing-wait-for-male-contraception-who-is-responsible-9f25fd750b93"><strong>Visit Now</strong></a></p>