Learning Styles Are A Myth
<p>I first encountered learning styles theory when I was taking a psychology class in college. We all took a quiz to determine our learning style; I was informed that, because I fidgeted a lot, liked to play sports, and favored learning through active participation, I was a kinesthetic learner.</p>
<p>As someone who spent ten hours a week reading for pleasure, thrived on classroom discussion, and wasn’t particularly <em>good</em> at sports, I found this a bit perplexing, but I believed it at the time.</p>
<p>You have almost certainly heard of learning styles–the idea that there are several distinct ways of learning, and each person will learn most effectively if they’re taught in the <em>one </em>of those styles that works best for you. That second thing–the idea that everyone has a single style that works best for them–is called the <em>meshing hypothesis.</em></p>
<p>The version you have most likely heard of is the VAK model– visual, auditory, kinesthetic. You may also have heard of the newer VARK model– visual, auditory, reading/writing, and kinesthetic.</p>
<p><a href="https://betterhumans.pub/learning-styles-are-a-myth-d25d0e06e362"><strong>Learn More</strong></a></p>