A Comparison of the Roman and Han Empires

<p>The rise of the Roman Republic can in some ways be compared to the rise of the Qin state to prominence.&nbsp;Both were in the western margin of the civilized ecumene (the Greek states and the eastern Chinese states respectively) and were viewed as semi-barbaric. Their geographical position favored a focus on military capability. Both Rome and Qin were militaristic states. Both were able to develop thanks to being shielded by their geographical position from the great powers in the east. Eventually they were able to gain hegemonic power over a large sector of the ecumene, Italy for Rome and Sichuan for Qin. Then, in a series of high stake wars, Rome and Qin conquered their known ecumene. Qin was able to do so faster thanks to its protobureaucracy compared to the somewhat limited administrative capabilities of the oligarchic Roman state. In the first two centuries AD for Rome and from the second century BC to second century AD in China, the Roman and Han Empires focused on internal homogenization and slowed down their expansion.</p> <p><a href="https://medium.com/@christoss200/a-comparison-of-the-roman-and-han-empires-9a8116f5b53c"><strong>Website</strong></a></p>
Tags: Han Empiress