Science isn’t hermeneutics of suspicion — the questions to ask before halal and haram

I would like to thank the Alhambra Gesellschaft for the opportunity to hold such a discourse. It is important for Muslims to have a dialogue at this level. <a href="https://alhambra-gesellschaft.de/2021/01/warum-wir-die-welt-in-halal-und-haram-sehen/" rel="noopener ugc nofollow" target="_blank">Kurnaz’s contribution </a>was a long time ago and I would like to thank <a href="https://alhambra-gesellschaft.de/2022/03/warum-halal-und-haram-doch-nicht-so-schlimm-sind-die-rehabilitierung-der-tradition-jenseits-von-idealisierung-und-verachtung/" rel="noopener ugc nofollow" target="_blank">Hakkı Arslan for commenting on Kurnaz’s contribution and presenting his point of view as a respected scholar.</a> In a nutshell, Kurnaz is concerned with the fact that the world is more complicated and the individual human being more complex than the norms of scholarship could grasp. In essence, he seems to be concerned with giving individuals more room for their own religious sense of right and wrong. Hakkı Arslan’s entire contribution, however, seems to focus on the fact that Kurnaz seems to characterise the development of the history of ideas as a deliberate embedding of his own theological freedoms. <a href="https://medium.com/@bayraktar_mf/science-is-not-a-hermeneutic-of-suspicion-the-questions-to-ask-before-halal-and-haram-0bc63bae918c">Visit Now</a>