GPTQ or bitsandbytes: Which Quantization Method to Use for LLMs — Examples with Llama 2
<p>As large language models (LLM) got bigger with more and more parameters, new techniques to reduce their memory usage have also been proposed.</p>
<p>One of the most effective methods to reduce the model size in memory is <strong>quantization</strong>. You can see quantization as a compression technique for LLMs. In practice, the main goal of quantization is to lower the precision of the LLM’s weights, typically from 16-bit to 8-bit, 4-bit, or even 3-bit, with minimal performance degradation.</p>
<p>There are two popular quantization methods for LLMs: GPTQ and bitsandbytes.</p>
<p>In this article, I discuss what the main differences between these two approaches are. They both have their own advantages and disadvantages that make them suitable for different use cases. I present a comparison of their memory usage and inference speed using Llama 2. I also discuss their performance based on experiments from previous work.</p>
<p><a href="https://towardsdatascience.com/gptq-or-bitsandbytes-which-quantization-method-to-use-for-llms-examples-with-llama-2-f79bc03046dc">Website</a></p>