On Buddha and Temperament
<p>William James’ typology of philosophers of the tender-minded and the tough-minded temperament provides a compelling analogy here. James used this categorization not for theoretical purposes, but to encourage effective action, to ‘get things done’ in the business of philosophy. He recognized a temperamental pattern in philosophical thought — and feeling! — and suggested that the two be viewed as a fierce battle or a harmonious dance, depending, precisely, on the type of philosopher one happens to be.</p>
<p>This temperamental perspective, blending thinking and feeling, persuasively appeals to skeptics and naysayers about recognizing patterns. Regardless of self-perception, engaging with this typology eventually locates one’s rightful niche. It’s a self-consistent, fractal-like toolkit; initially, you may favor certain tools, but their use gently shapes you over time, encouraging the adoption of others. Even those initially reluctant to identify with one of the two broad categories will eventually discern the underlying pattern.</p>
<p><a href="https://themodernmoralist.com/on-buddha-and-temperaments-d90cb67d9aa0"><strong>Read More</strong></a></p>